In: Uncategorized
17 Oct 2010Given that Richard Layard’s Movement for Happiness is due to be launched in Britain in January it makes sense to be prepared. The former government’s “happiness tsar” will no doubt attack prosperity while arguing happiness should be the over-riding goal of state policy and for individuals.
Two recent Battles in Print from the Institute of Ideas should help make the case against this unhealthy obsession with happiness. Ashley Frawley, a PhD student at the University of Kent, probes the meaning of happiness and “well-being” in the contemporary discussion. Karl Sharro, an architect, directly takes on the Movement for Happiness in a discussion that focuses on the debate in relation to architecture. Along the way he makes the important point that the notion of happiness pursued by the Movement for Happiness is, contrary to their claims, directly contrary to the spirit of the Enlightenment.
Brendan O’Neill’s recent spiked article on how the trapped Chilean miners were treated as vulnerable victims despite their admirable resilience is also relevant to the discussion.
Welcome to danielbenami.com.
To contact me email ferraris AT danielbenami.com
I also have a Facebook fan page.
Follow me on Twitter at @danielbenami.
Ferraris For All, my book defending economic progress, has just been published in an extended edition in paperback and on Kindle with a new chapter on the inequality debate.
Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.de,
Please see the Buy the book page for more details.