In: Uncategorized
28 Apr 2010A recent post on the Political Climate blog reminded me of the immense influence of Ulrich Beck, a German sociologist of risk, on the discussion of the relationship about humanity and the environment. The article accurately sums up Beck’s central argument as follows:
“modern industry solves the old problem of scarcity, but in doing so it creates a new problem, in the form of widespread environmental hazards. It is these hazards, which modernity itself has created, and dealing with them, that defines reflexive modernity.”
This argument is wrong on several counts:
Beck is also mentioned in the recent Big Potatoes manifesto on innovation (p33). Evidently Beck sees innovation, contrary to the authors of the manifesto, as running amok rather than slowing down. The German professor argues that innovation benefits companies but humans generally suffer as a result of it.
Although Beck’s views are profoundly mistaken they should be tackled precisely because they are so influential.
Welcome to danielbenami.com.
To contact me email ferraris AT danielbenami.com
I also have a Facebook fan page.
Follow me on Twitter at @danielbenami.
Ferraris For All, my book defending economic progress, has just been published in an extended edition in paperback and on Kindle with a new chapter on the inequality debate.
Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.de,
Please see the Buy the book page for more details.